南掌即老挝谬说考-清史研究.pdfVIP

2009 年11 月 清史研究 Nov. 2009 第4 期 Studies in Qing History No4 南掌即老挝 谬说考 李坤睿 [ ] 南掌是清代的朝贡国。大清会典 等史料称 南掌即老挝, 此说常 作为通说接受。然而, 明代的老挝在明清之际已经一分为三, 其中的琅勃拉邦王国于雍正时向中国进贡; 所谓南掌系指琅勃拉邦。 南掌即老挝 的谬见的产生和沿承, 与朝贡体制下清政府获取南掌信息的方式与特点相关。晚清时, 人们 增进了对南掌的了解, 发现南掌已 暹罗吞并, 但 南掌即老挝 的通说地位却一直未获动摇, 延续至今。 [ ] 南掌 琅勃拉邦 朝贡 薛福成 [ ] K249 [ ] A [ ] 1002- 858 ( 2009) - 04- 0056- 16 Nanzhangas another Name of Laos: A Mistaken View Nanzhangwas one of Qing Dynastys tributary states. It is widely assumed that Nanzhangwas another name of Laos. The Da Qing H uidian and many other histor ical sources support this view. However, Laos, which had been a united kingdom in the Ming Dynasty, divided into three parts in the late seventeenth century and early eighteenth century. The northern territory of Laos became a new kingdom, Luang Prabang, which was known as Nanzhang in Chinese records. Thus, the view that Nanzhangwas another name of Laos is mistaken. The provenance and general acceptance of this view is related to some features of information gathering under the tributary system. In the late Qing , people had a better understanding of Nanzhang. In fact, many people knew that Siam had annexed Nanzhang. Despite this, most people still held the erroneous v iew that Nanzhangwas another name for Laos. 南掌国作为清朝的朝 国之一, 见载于嘉 民国时期的研究未能澄清这一见解。50、60 庆、光绪朝 钦定大清会典 及 钦定大清会 年代, 随着中国对印度支那事务的重视, 报刊 典事例。嘉庆朝 钦定大清会典 卷三十一 登载了不少与老挝有关的介绍性文章, 代表了 云 南掌即老挝, 清史稿属国三 云 南 时人对该 国历史现状 的一般认识。1956 年, 掌旧称老挝。此说被引为通说。后人著述谈 新观察 的一篇文章认为: 相传在纪元前 及南掌时, 大多将其与老挝等同。