务实折中主义、新古典现实主义和后结构主义：非洲应对2011年利比亚危机的反思.pdf

Third World Quarterly ISSN: 0143-6597 (Print) 1360-2241 (Online) Journal homepage: /loi/ctwq20 Pragmatic eclecticism, neoclassical realism and post-structuralism: reconsidering the African response to the Libyan crisis of 2011 Linnéa Gelot & Martin Welz To cite this article: Linnéa Gelot & Martin Welz (2019): Pragmatic eclecticism, neoclassical realism and post-structuralism: reconsidering the African response to the Libyan crisis of 2011, Third World Quarterly, DOI: 10.10802018.1552078 To link to this article: /10.10802018.1552078 Published online: 17 Jan 2019. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 78 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at /action/journalInformation?journalCode=ctwq20 Third World QuarT erly /10.10802018.1552078 Pragmatic eclecticism, neoclassical realism and post- structuralism: reconsidering the African response to the Libyan crisis of 2011 Linnéa Gelota and Martin Welzb a Folke Bernadotte academy, Stockholm, Sweden; bdepartment of Politics and Public administration, university of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY This article analyses the role of the African Union (AU) during the Libyan Received 18 April 2018 crisis of 2011. It addresses the question of why the AU has not played a Accepted 19 November 2018 central conflict manager role in that crisis. Inspired by pragmatic eclec- ticism, we take a theoretical detour to answer this question. Through a neoclassical realist and post-structuralist lens, we provide a novel eclec- KEYWORDS tic reconsideration of the crisis response and we also highlight shar