脚本评论第共对scriptj考官学术写作乐队.pdfVIP

Page 1 of 1 Comments on Script J Examiner Comments on Academic Writing Task 2 International Tourism Script J Band 7 The candidate addresses both aspects of the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. Main ideas are generally clear and relevant, although some supporting ideas lack focus (as in the opening of paragraph 2). Ideas are generally well-organised, and there is a clear overall progression with only minor lapses where points are not well-integrated into the argument. A range of cohesive devices is used effectively, although there is some under- use of connectives and substitution, and some lapses in the use of referencing. A good range of vocabulary is used with some flexibility and precision. The candidate has a good awareness of style and collocation, although occasional awkward expressions or inappropriacies in word choice and word form limit the rating. Likewise, a good range of sentence structures is used with a high level of accuracy resulting in frequent error-free sentences. Minor systematic errors persist, however, and punctuation is unhelpful at times. 第 1 页，共 1 页对 Script J 的评论考官对学术写作 Task 2 International Tourism Script J 的评论乐队 7 候选人阐述了任务的两个方面，并在整个回答中提出了明确的立场。主要想法通常是清晰且相关的，尽管一些支持性想法缺乏重点（如第 2 段的 开头）。想法通常组织良好，并且有是一个清晰的整体进展，只有一些小的失误，其中的观点没有很好地融入到论证中。有效地使用了一系列衔接手段， 尽管连接词和替换有一些使用不足，并且在引用的使用方面存在一些失误。词汇使用范围广泛，具有一定的灵活性和精确度。考生对文体和搭配有良 好的意识，尽管偶尔出现尴尬的表达或选词和词形不恰当的情况限制了评分。同样，使用了良好的句子结构具有很高的准确性，导致经常出现无错误 的句子。然而，较小的系统错误仍然存在，而且标点符号有时没有帮助。