学术论文 - 垃圾分类外文文献.pdf

J Mater Cycles Waste Manag (2014) 16:321-334 DOI 10. 1007/si 0 163-013 -0190-1 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Comparison research on waste classification between China and the EU · Japan · and the USA X u efen g Wen • Qingming L uo• Hualong Hu• Na Wang• Ying C hen• Jing Jin• Yongli Hao• Guanying Xu• Fen gming Li• Wenjie Fang Received: 4 October 2012/Accepted: 22 Augu.~12013/Published online: 13 September2013 e Springer Japan 2013 Abstract Waste and waste management have become micro integration waste class ification systems are more significant g lobal issues and common challenges that we face. suitable for China to learn which process-oriented waste Efficient and effective waste management is an essentia l part classification is used for declaration and registration at the of civilized society. A good waste classification system is the micro-level and substance-oriented waste classification system foundation 血d precondition for efficient waste management. for environmental statistics at the macro- level. In this paper, in accordance with waste classification principles of systematicness • hierarchy • practical Ke}"\'ords Waste clawssification • Process-oriented • Source- maneuverability and expansibility, waste classification oriented • Hazardous property • systems in China, the EU, Japan and the USA are reviewed for Envirorunental management collection, transportation and treatment sectors. Comparison analysis results show that waste classification methods are diversified and process-oriented classificat ion, substance- Introduction oriented and hazardous properties classification principles are widely adopted for waste generation and transportation. For