上海名校2021年高二下英语试卷精选汇编-06.阅读C篇专题.docx

上海名校2021年高二下英语试卷精选汇编-06.阅读C篇专题.docx

  1. 1、本文档共34页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
上海名校2021年高二下试卷精选汇编——06.阅读C篇专题 2021年第二学期格致中学第一次测验高二年级英语试卷 (C) Shrimp cocktail, grilled steak with pear kimchi(泡菜)and chocolate cake. Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un had the same food brought to them on individual plates during their summit on February 27th. Psychologists think a meal like this is a good first step towards improving relations. But new work suggests there might have been a more positive outcome with a different serving arrangement. As Kaitlin Woolley of Cornell University and Ayelet Fishbach of the University of Chicago report in Psychological Science, a meal taken “family-style” from a central plate can greatly improve the outcome of subsequent negotiations. Having conducted previous research in 2017 revealing that eating similar foods led to people feeling emotionally closer to one another, Dr. Woolley and Dr. Fishbach wondered whether the way food was served also had a psychological effect. They theorized that, on the one hand, sharing food with other people might indicate food scarcity and increase a notion of competition. However, they also reasoned that it could instead lead people to become more aware of others’ needs and drive co-operative behavior as a result. For the first test they recruited 100 pairs of participants, none of whom knew each other. They were sat at a table and fed chips with sauce. Half the pairs were given their own basket of 20 grams of chips and a bowl of 25 grams of sauce, and half were given 40 grams of chips and 50 grams of sauce to share. The game required the participants to negotiate an hourly wage rate during a fictional strike. Each person was randomly assigned to represent the union or management. The researchers measured co-operation by noting the number of rounds it took to reach an agreement, and found that those who shared food resolved the strike significantly faster (in 8.7 rounds) than those who did not (13.2 rounds). A similar experiment was conducted with 104 participants and Goldfish crackers, this time n

文档评论(0)

一脚踏进桃花坞 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档