关于特殊目的收购公司上市首次公开募股介绍简介概述有关的外文文献翻译成品:企业上市的路径选择:借壳上市还是IPO?(中英文双语对照).docx

关于特殊目的收购公司上市首次公开募股介绍简介概述有关的外文文献翻译成品:企业上市的路径选择:借壳上市还是IPO?(中英文双语对照).docx

  1. 1、本文档共28页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
此文档是毕业设计外文翻译成品( 含英文原文+中文翻译),无需调整复杂的格式!下载之后直接可用,方便快捷!本文价格不贵,也就几十块钱!一辈子也就一次的事! 文献出处:Philip Brown,Andrew Ferguson,Peter Lam SSRN Electronic Journal · July 2020(如觉得年份太老,可改为近2年,毕竟很多毕业生都这样做) 英文4922单词,30737字符(字符就是印刷符),中文7865汉字。(如果字数多了,可自行删减,大多数学校都是要求选取外文的一部分内容进行翻译的。) Choice between Alternative Routes to Go Public: Backdoor Listing versus IPO 1.Introduction Going public is the dream of many private companies. It represents a major milestone in the development of a firm. The listing status brings a lot of advantages to a firm. Some of these advantages include (1) access to capital markets and lower cost of capital; (2) enhanced company reputation and profile; (3) providing liquidity for owners to cash out; and (4) use of stock to pay for acquisitions, among others. However, going public is also a costly process. The out-of-pocket costs for an IPO typically involve fees paid for investment banks, accountants, auditors, lawyers, other experts, underwriters and brokers. The IPO firm will also have to pay for the printing of a prospectus and listing fees and other compliance costs. Other hidden costs entail underpricing, more stringent disclosure and regulatory requirements and the time spent by senior management in preparing the company for public listing. Traditionally, going public via an IPO has been the predominant path for a private firm to obtain a listing status on a stock exchange. However, alternative routes for going public are also available. These include reverse takeover (RTO) or reverse merger (RM) and sell-out to a publicly-listed firm. The two alternatives are similar in the sense that both involve a publicly- listed company taking over a privately-owned firm. The major difference between the two lies in the ultimate control of the combined entity. In RTOs (or RMs), the private firm shareholders will have control whereas in the case of sell-outs, the public firm shareholders will still retain control. Because of the unique features of the RTO (or RM) transact

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

peidong88 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档