口腔种植修复和常规修复在牙列缺损治疗中疗效探讨.docVIP

口腔种植修复和常规修复在牙列缺损治疗中疗效探讨 　　【摘要】 目的 探讨口腔种植修复和常规修复在牙列缺损治疗中的疗效。方法 98例（98颗）接受牙列缺损治疗的患者， 依据就诊顺序分为观察组与参照组， 每组49例（49颗）。参照组接受常规修复治疗， 观察组接受口腔种植修复治疗， 观察比较两组临床疗效、不良反应发生情况及满意度。 　　结果 观察组总有效率95.92%高于参照组的77.55%， 差异具有统计学意义（P0.05）。观察组不良反应发生率8.16%低于参照组的24.49%， 差异具有统计学意义（P0.05）。观察组固定功能、咀嚼功能、语言功能、美观度、舒适度的满意度评分均高于参照组， 差异具有统计学意义（P0.05）。结论 对牙列缺损患者施以口腔种植修复治疗的疗效更佳， 且安全性更高， 可有效保证牙齿美观度。 　　【关键词】 牙列缺损；常规修复；口腔种植修复；临床疗效 　　DOI：10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2018.09.013 　　【Abstract】 Objective To discuss the efficacy of oral implant repair and routine repair in the treatment of dentition defect. Methods A total of 98 patients （98 involved teeth） receiving dentition defect treatment were divided by visiting order into observation group and control group， with 49 cases （49 involved teeth） in each group. The control group was treated with routine repair， and the observation group was treated with oral implant repair. Observation and comparison were made on clinical efficacy， occurrence of adverse reactions and satisfaction between the two groups. Results The observation group had higher total effective rate as 95.92% than 77.55% in the control group， and the difference was statistically significant （P0.05）. The observation group had lower incidence of adverse reactions as 8.16% than 24.49% in the control group， and the difference was statistically significant （P0.05）. The observation group had satisfaction score of fixed function， chewing function， language function， aesthetics， comfort than the control group， and their difference was statistically significant （P0.05）. Conclusion Oral implant repair shows better efficacy for patients with dentition defect with higher safety， and it can effectively ensure the beauty of the teeth. 　　【Key words】 Dentition defect； Routine repair； Oral implant repair； Clinical efficacy 　　牙列缺?p是一种较为常见的牙齿疾病， 是由于牙齿缺失而导致牙列出现不完整的疾病， 不仅严重影响了患者的咀嚼功能， 而且对患者的牙齿美观度产生影响， 使患者的生理及心理舒适度严重降低。临床中对牙列缺损采取人工材料修复作为常见治疗方法， 而口腔种植修复技术以其恢复咀嚼功能效果优良、美观舒适等优点越来越广泛的应用于临床治疗。本研究对牙列缺损采取口腔种植修复的临床疗效实施进一步分