仲裁协议有效性问题之研究.docVIP

PAGE 19 - 仲裁协议有效性问题之研究—从国际商事法庭第一案谈起 摘 要 随着各国经济交往的不断加深，商事主体间的争议也越来越多，相较于诉讼而言，仲裁以其自身的快速性、公正性成为绝大多数商事主体解决纠纷的首要选择。而在仲裁中，仲裁协议是仲裁的基础与前提，仲裁协议的有效性问题由于涉及争议能否进入仲裁程序且仲裁裁决能否被承认与执行，因此更是仲裁协议的关键。但由于各国立法对仲裁协议效力认定的规定各不相同，如何认定仲裁协议的有效性便至关重要。 本文以国际商事法庭第一案为例进行案例剖析，围绕仲裁协议的有效性问题，通过参考已有的文献和相关法规，对这类协议的效力问题进行理论推理，从而明晰其认定标准和必备生效的要素，并探讨国际商事法庭第一案，即运裕案与仲裁协议有效性问题的关系，同时，对运裕案中未涉及的仲裁协议有效性内容加以补充，研究在何种情况下仲裁协议会被认定为有效，如何使认定标准更趋向于国际化潮流，使我国成为仲裁大国。 关键词：仲裁协议；有效性；仲裁条款独立性原则；有效性认定 Abstract With the continuous deepening of economic exchanges between countries, there are more and more disputes between commercial entities. Compared with litigation, arbitration has become the primary choice for most commercial entities to resolve disputes with its own speed and fairness. In arbitration, the arbitration agreement is the basis and premise of arbitration. The validity of the arbitration agreement is the key to the arbitration agreement because it involves whether the dispute can enter the arbitration procedure and whether the arbitration award can be recognized and enforced. However, due to the different provisions on the determination of the validity of arbitration agreements in different countries, how to determine the validity of arbitration agreements is very important. This article takes the first case of the International Commercial Court as an example to analyze the case. Focusing on the validity of the arbitration agreement, by referring to the existing literature and related regulations, the theoretical reasoning of the validity of this type of agreement is theoretically inferred, so as to clarify its determination criteria and necessary Prepare for the effective elements and discuss the relationship between the first case of the International Commercial Court, that is, the Yunyu case and the validity of the arbitration agreement, and at the same time, supplement the validity content of the arbitration agreement that is not involved in the Yunyu case, and study the situation The next arbitration agree