Blackwell Publishing Forthcoming In Contemporary Debates In The Philosophy Of Science Ed Christopher Hitchcock Probability Captures The Logic布莱克韦尔出版社即将出现在科学哲学的当代辩论中克里斯托弗·希区柯克概率捕捉逻辑.pdf
- 1、本文档共28页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
PROBABILITY CAPTURES THE LOGIC OF
SCIENTIFIC CONFIRMATION
1. Introduction
‘Confirmation’ is a word in ordinary language and, like many such
words, its meaning is vague and perhaps also ambiguous. So if we think
of a logic of confirmation as a specification of precise rules that govern
the word ‘confirmation’ in ordinary language, there can be no logic of
confirmation. There can, however, be a different kind of logic of con-
firmation. This can be developed using the philosophical methodology
known as explication (Carnap, 1950, ch. 1). In this methodology, we
are given an unclear concept of ordinary language (called the explican-
dum) and our task is to find a precise concept (called the explicatum)
that is similar to the explicandum and is theoretically fruitful and
simple. Since the choice of an explicatum involves several desiderata,
which different people may interpret and weight differently, there is not
one “right” explication; different people may choose different explicata
without either having made a mistake. Nevertheless, we can cite reasons
that motivate us to choose one explicatum over another.
In this paper I will define a predicate ‘C ’ which is intended to be
an explicatum for confirmation. I will establish a variety of results
about ‘C ’ dealing with verified consequences, reasoning by analogy,
universal generalizations, Nicod’s condition, the ravens paradox, and
projectability. We will find that these results correspond well with
intuitive judgments about confirmation, thus showing that our expli-
catum has the desired properties of being similar to its explicandum
and theoretically fruitful. In this way we will develop parts of a logic of
confirmation. The predicate ‘C ’ will be defined in terms of probability
and in that sense we will con
您可能关注的文档
- Gary McMahon Different Skin mobi加里麦克马洪不同的皮肤.pdf
- Why and How to Certify Sprayed Concrete Nozzle Operators为什么和如何认证喷射混凝土喷嘴操作员.pdf
- Harman Gilbert Detachment Probability and Maximum Likelihood哈曼吉尔伯特支队概率和最大似然.pdf
- The Pratical Guide to Managing Risk管理风险的实用指南.pdf
- Philosophical Conceptions Of The Self; Implications For Cognitive Science Trends In Cognitive Sciences对自我的哲学观念对认知科学中的认知科学趋势的启示.pdf
- McKinsey Banking Innovation麦肯锡银行业创新.pdf
- Cei 60034 22 Rotating Electrical Machines Ac Generators For Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engine Driven Generating Sets旋转电机用于往复式内燃机驱动发电机组的发电机.pdf
- Emotion Neuroscience and Investing By James Montier情感神经科学与投资.pdf
- Fischer Black and Myron Scholes The Pricing Of Options And Corporate Liabilities 1973和年期权和公司负债的定价.pdf
- Precision Temperature Sensor精密温度传感器.pdf
文档评论(0)